Code:
N5-0086
Period:
1.7.2018 - 30.6.2021
Range on year:
0.79 FTE | 2018
Project leader at FDV:
prof.dr. Alojzij Slavko Splichal
Research activity:
Social sciences
The phases of the project and their realization:
Associated with the main objectives, the original project is structured into three work
packages:
Work Package 1 is devoted to the IPPCN affordances for public action and privacy
protection. It ought to track important, defining traits and shifts in the meanings and
practices of public(it)y and privac(it)y, and their relationship to proficiency in certain
technology skills. Three generations in terms of communication technologies they
encountered during their primary and secondary socialization – the TV generation born
before 1960 and raised in the analogue age, the PC generation born after 1960, and the
smartphone generation born after 1990 – ought to be the subject of this WP in the original
project.
Work Package 2 concentrates on journalists’ responses to internetization. Internetization
challenges the basic critical-normative functions of mass media related to the formation of
publics and public opinion: (1) making visible developments in the socio-political
environment with important long-term consequences for citizens; (2) providing citizens
access to the media needed for their “public use of reason”; (3) conducting surveillance of
political and economic rulers and legitimising their decisions; and (4) mediating between the
rulers and the ruled and cultivating reflexive publicity. This WP ought to investigate how
internetization affects the articulation of these functions of the media as the central pillars in
the public sphere constitutive to democratic governance.
Work Package 3 is aimed at measuring public-worthiness of news and events. Based on the existing affordances of the EventRegistry developed in the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
of the Jožef Stefan Institute, this WP ought to develop Artificial Intelligence-based tools to
measure specific qualities and importance of news/events in the online environment, which
would offer internet users new possibilities for communicative action locally, nationally and
transnationally. WP3 is based on the EventRegistry system, which gathers news on more
than 10,000 events daily from all over the world, reported by over 100,000 most widely used
media sites/sources, social media and blogs in 100 languages. In each news item, the
system identifies specific topics, actors, location, date, and source. News items in different
languages that report the same event can be recognized and clustered to make an ‘event’
the unit of analysis.
Research Organisation:
http://www.sicris.si/public/jqm/prj.aspx?lang=eng&opt=2&subopt=403&hits=1&id=17043&search_term=N5-0086
Researchers:
http://www.sicris.si/public/jqm/prj.aspx?lang=eng&opt=2&subopt=402&hits=1&id=17043&search_term=N5-0086
Citations for bibliographic records:
http://www.sicris.si/public/jqm/prj.aspx?lang=eng&opt=2&subopt=400&hits=1&id=17043&search_term=N5-0086
Abstract:
New private, public and hybrid modes of communication challenge social researchers to
reconsider democratic potentials of ‘revolutionary’ communication technologies and
reconceptualise privateness, publicness, and conceptual categories related to them. This
brings us also to the central research question of this project: How can the communicative
potential of the internet be used to support an effective public opinion generated by publics,
able to achieve an outlet in collective action extending beyond short-term mobilization, and
protected against autonomy and privacy threats? Its primary interest is in the internet’s
emancipatory power: Is it strong enough to enhance new democratic platforms cultivating
reflexive publicity, the Kantian “public use of reason?” Or has internetization blended
publicness and privateness in a way that not only would not allow us to reach “the final stage
of democracy,” but may also seriously compromise our rights and freedoms?
The project is structured in two work packages concentrating on hybridization of journalism
(WP1) and reconfiguration of the 'newsworthiness' of events (WP2). They are both focused
on the expanding scope of publicity attributed to the internet and its emancipatory potential
of creating new democratic platforms and fostering reflexive publicity. Information
abundance appears to generate an inflation in political communication and a communicative
liquefaction of politics. In the anarchic online environment, citizens function as their own
gatekeepers navigating a world saturated with information, yet strongly affected by
corporations that increasingly control both the infrastructure of integrated public-private
communication networks and content production, distribution and consumption. While
customising their services to users’ tastes and preferences, corporate content providers
suppress visibility of certain actors and contents, and trap internet users in the ‘filter bubbles’
of like-minded people not exposed to information that could challenge opinions reinforcing
their preferences. The threat of structural invisibility, a permanent possibility of not being
granted online visibility by algorithmic logic of search engines and news feeds, is as perilous
as the Benthamian-Orwellian threat of a permanent digital surveillance and imposed
visibility.
Specifically, WP1 is designed to provide a clearer picture of the new dynamics in the field of
journalism that internetization spurred, in regard to professional identities, practices and
norms of journalism, modes of engagement and the struggles for legitimacy of various
categories of journalism, and its mediating role in the public sphere. WP2 is aimed at the
reconfiguration of the 'newsworthiness' of events that has been originally defined by Galtung
and Ruge (1965) and subsequently amended with additional “news values” or “factors”, but
never reconceptualized from the viewpoint of citizens or internet users as editors or
gatekeepers – as ‘public-worthiness’. The idea of public-worthiness refers to the question,
what events, processes and actors should be (able to be made) visible, and to whom? The
public-worthiness algorithm should offer the internet users information on relevant events
and processes with potentially important long-term consequences for a significant number of
people.
Back to list of projects